🪰514,879 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

128 CHINESE RESTAURANT

1028 BUENAVENTURA BLVD, KISSIMMEE, FL 34743

License #5906791

🥡 Chinese ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Quick take

128 CHINESE RESTAURANT in KISSIMMEE currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 91.2 out of 100 — a B grade — generally clean with some minor or moderate violations on record. This restaurant has 2 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on August 28, 2025. Across those visits, inspectors documented 20 total violations — 5 critical, 2 major, 13 minor.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
2
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on August 28, 2025 included 3 critical violations, 0 major, and 8 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Imported observations
20
Coverage note
Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
  • When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Inspection Completed - No Further Action
  • [23-03-4] Nonfood-contact surface soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust. Shelving where to go bags are stored
  • [40-06-5] Employee personal items stored in or above a food preparation area, food, clean equipment and utensils, or single-service items. Water bottle stored at dry storage shelf Phone stored on top of box
  • [05-09-4] No conspicuously located ambient air temperature thermometer in holding unit. Reach in cooler at cooks line
  • [02D-01-5] Working containers of food removed from original container not identified by common name. Flour in clear container at cooks line
  • [35B-01-4] Exterior door has a gap at the threshold that opens to the outside. Screen door at back door
  • [29-42-4] Vacuum breaker missing at mop sink faucet or on fitting/splitter added to mop sink faucet.
  • [35A-05-4] Roach activity present as evidenced by live roaches found. One live roach on to go bags at expedite station. Operator killed and discarded
  • [22-16-4] Reach-in freezers interior/shelves have accumulation of soil residues.
  • [08A-17-6] Raw animal foods not properly separated from one another based upon minimum required cooking temperature when stored in a freezer - not all products commercially packaged. Frozen raw chicken stored over frozen raw fish. Operator moved
  • [10-07-4] In-use utensil stored in standing water less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Spoon stored in water temping at 100F
  • [36-34-5] Ceiling/ceiling tiles/vents soiled with accumulated food debris, grease, dust, or mold-like substance. Walk in cooler ceiling
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

128 CHINESE RESTAURANT looks fairly solid on paper. Would you eat here?

B record

Solid overall, with enough history that people may still weigh the details differently.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.