🪰514,879 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

94TH. AERO SQUADRON

1395 NW 57 AVE, MIAMI, FL 33126-2013

License #2314758

🍽️ American ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Quick take

94TH. AERO SQUADRON in MIAMI currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 71.9 out of 100 — a C grade — a noticeable pattern of violations across recent inspections. This restaurant has 4 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on May 6, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 33 total violations — 2 critical, 7 major, 24 minor.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
4
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on May 6, 2026 had no critical findings, but inspectors still documented 1 major and 8 minor violations.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Imported observations
33
Coverage note
Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
  • When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Call Back - Complied
  • [22-31-4] Non-pitting surface rust on food-contact equipment. Observed on dry food racks.
  • [42-01-4] Wet mop not stored in a manner to allow the mop to dry. Observed on floor outside of building.
  • [14-69-4] Ice buildup in reach-in freezer and/or walk-in freezer. Observed in chest freezer.
  • [36-22-4] Floor area(s) covered with standing water. Observed in warewash area due to broken floor tiles.
  • [14-17-4] Walk-in cooler/freezer shelves with rust that has pitted the surface. Observed in walk in freezer.
  • [16-21-4] Accumulation of debris on exterior of warewashing machine. Observed exterior soiled.
  • [36-17-5] Floor tiles missing and/or in disrepair. Observed in ware wash area.
  • [14-74-7] Cold holding equipment not maintained in good repair. Do not store time/temperature control for safety food in this unit until the unit is repaired. Observed reach in cooler across chest freezer with ambient temp of 50F. The following TCS foods stored inside for less than 4 hours: halved tomato (56F - Cold Holding); cooked shrimp (44/45F - Cold Holding); flan (54F - Cold Holding); cut lettuce (56F - Cold Holding); roasted peppers (53F - Cold Holding). Operator removed all items and placed into walk in cooler.
  • [14-33-4] Reach-in cooler shelves with rust that has pitted the surface. Observed in multiple reach in coolers.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

94TH. AERO SQUADRON has some meaningful issues on record. Would you still eat here?

C record

This is where the context matters most — some people will still eat there, others will want cleaner inspections first.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.