🪰78,010 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

CITY PHO

3402 TECHNOLOGICAL AVE STE 124, ORLANDO, FL 32817

License #5815051

🍽️ Thai/Vietnamese ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Latest inspection
July 13, 2026 · 14 findings · 2 critical
Routine - Food
View inspection data
Need help reading this?
Newest inspection first. Red dots matter most.

The score is the shortcut, but the inspection timeline is the proof. Start with the newest visit, then scan for repeat critical or major findings.

Critical
Highest-priority rows.
Major
Worth checking for repeats.
Minor
Usually lower-risk context.
Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
1
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on July 13, 2026 shows 11 observation rows: 2 critical, 4 major, and 5 minor.

Official record

DBPR source + data confidence

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Inspector notes
11
Coverage note
Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL turns public DBPR records into a scan-friendly timeline. Use the official DBPR link when you want to verify the newest inspection at the source.

What you’ll see here
  • Inspector notes appear inline when available.
  • The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
Map + verification

Open the place or verify the record

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Disposition: Warning Issued
  • [10-08-5] Ice scoop handle in contact with ice. Removed
  • [41-07-4] Container of medicine improperly stored. Hand cream and body splash stored on table next to plastic wrap
  • [50-09-4] Current Hotel and Restaurant license not displayed.
  • [12B-07-4] Employee beverage container on a food preparation table or over/next to clean equipment/utensils. Employee coffee stored on prep table that had noodles
  • [02C-03-5] Commercially processed ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food opened and held more than 24 hours not properly date marked after opening. Opened kimchi bottle with no date marked. Employees date marked.
  • [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Pulled shell eggs 53F kept in cook line for 10 minutes . Operator discarded .
  • [02B-01-5] Menu does not identify which items contain raw or undercooked animal foods covered by the consumer advisory. Sunny side up not identified as raw , all menus must be fixed.
  • [10-07-4] In-use utensil stored in standing water less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Spatulas and scissors stored in water with temperature of 82F.
  • [08B-47-4] Food not stored at least 6 inches off of the floor. Bags of meats stored on walk in freezer floor. Bucket of broth stored in walk in cooler floor. Perrier water bottles stored on floor by beer cooler. Employee picked up
  • [02C-02-5] Ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared onsite and held more than 24 hours not properly date marked. Cooked chicken , cooked beef, broths with no date marked. Soups pulled from freezer with no date mark. Employees date marked
  • [31A-11-4] Handwash sink used for purposes other than handwashing. Employee washed items in hand sink by ice machine
For business owners

Own or manage a business?

FairScore is a separate free beta for business owners who want a fairer way to understand online reviewer behavior.

FairScore does not change InspectFL scores, inspection data, rankings, or coverage.

Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

CITY PHO looks fairly solid on paper. Would you eat here?

B record

Solid overall, with enough history that people may still weigh the details differently.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.