🪰554,782 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

COGNAC

201 2 AVE N, ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33701

License #6217670

Quick take

COGNAC in ST. PETERSBURG currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 84.8 out of 100 — a C grade — a noticeable pattern of violations across recent inspections. This restaurant has 2 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on January 6, 2026. Across those visits, DBPR recorded 22 total findings; InspectFL has imported detailed violation rows for 19 of them so far.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
2
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on January 6, 2026 included 1 critical violation, 4 major, and 2 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Imported observations
19
Coverage note
Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Imported inspector notes appear inline when available.
  • The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero imported notes.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
  • [22-02-4] Food-contact surface soiled with food debris, mold-like substance or slime. Can opener spike with dried food debris.
  • [29-49-6] Standing water in bottom of reach-in-cooler. Interior of reach in coolers across from fryers and stove top burners on cook line.
  • [31B-03-4] No soap provided at handwash sink. Missing at hand handsink at end of cook line across from walk in cooler. Hand handsink stocked.
  • [16-21-4] Accumulation of debris on exterior of warewashing machine. Discussed with dishwasher on duty.
  • [01C-03-4] Clam/mussel/oyster tags not marked with last date served. Observed for fresh oysters, mussels, and clam tags. Discussed with. Discussed with chef on duty.
  • [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Food items stored inside reach in cooler across from stove burners on cook line: sliced butter (50F - Cold Holding); cooked tomatoes (49F - Cold Holding); cooked asparagus (47F - Cold Holding); sliced ham (50 F - Cold Holding); raw grouper (47F - Cold Holding) Items moved to freezer to bring down temperature rapidly. Food items not out of temp more than 4 hours. Employees put bags of ice on items in reach in cooler to maintain the temperature 41 degrees or below. Re-temped items at 11:12am: sliced butter (37F - Cold Holding); cooked tomatoes (38F - Cold Holding); cooked asparagus (36F - Cold Holding); raw grouper (40F - Cold Holding). Owner called service technician to come check out unit.
  • [02A-01-5] Raw or undercooked oysters offered and establishment has no consumer advisory sign provided on wall, menu, placard, table tent or by any other written means. Raw animal foods must be fully cooked prior to service. Establishment recently started serving raw oysters. Emailed owner oyster consumer advisory and sign was printed and posted at the time of the inspection.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

COGNAC has some meaningful issues on record. Would you still eat here?

C record

This is where the context matters most — some people will still eat there, others will want cleaner inspections first.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.