COURTYARD FORT LAUDERDALE NORTH/CYPRESS CREEK

Name: COURTYARD FORT LAUDERDALE NORTH/CYPRESS CREEK
Address: 2440 W CYPRESS CREEK RD, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL, 33309, US
Rating: 83

2440 W CYPRESS CREEK RD, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309

License #1613477

🏨 Hotel/Resort ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate

83 Grade C / 100

Mixed Health Record

How is this score calculated? →

Quick take

COURTYARD FORT LAUDERDALE NORTH/CYPRESS CREEK in FORT LAUDERDALE currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 83 out of 100 — a C grade — a noticeable pattern of violations across recent inspections. This restaurant has 2 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on December 19, 2025. Across those visits, DBPR recorded 22 total findings; InspectFL has imported detailed violation rows for 19 of them so far.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Read latest inspection ↓ Open official DBPR ↗ Compare nearby ↓

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.

Inspections on file

Clean inspections

Callback visits

Latest clean pass

None on file yet

The latest inspection on December 19, 2025 included 3 critical violations, 2 major, and 4 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR

Inspection coverage

100%

Imported observations

Coverage note

Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here

•Imported inspector notes appear inline when available.
•The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero imported notes.

Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

Open in Google Maps ↗ Open in Apple Maps ↗

DBPR

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
[13-03-4] Employee with no hair restraint while engaging in food preparation. Employee placed on hat.
[31B-02-4] No paper towels or mechanical hand drying device provided at handwash sink. Front bar.
[35A-02-7] Live, small flying insects found Observed three flying insects flying around speed rack in prep area not landing on anything. Employee killed and removed.
[51-11-4] Carbon dioxide/helium tanks not adequately secured. Front bar.
[08B-38-4] Food stored on floor. Observed box of cubed potatoes and strawberries on walk-in freezer floor.
[12B-07-4] Employee beverage container on a food preparation table or over/next to clean equipment/utensils. Observed open water bottle on cook line table. Employee removed.
[41-17-4] Spray bottle containing toxic glass cleaner substance not labeled. Operator labeled.
[29-34-4] Vacuum breaker missing at hose bibb or on fitting/splitter added to hose bibb. Observed hose attached to facet at three compartment sink missing a vacuum breaker.
[03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Observed chicken sandwichs (44-45F - Cold Holding) stored in hotel pan on cook line reach. Per operator held out of temperature less than 30 minutes not portion or prepared today. Operator voluntarily discarded.

Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse