🪰75,275 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

DONA AREPA

515 NE 20 ST, BOCA RATON, FL 33431

License #6022462

🌮 Mexican/Latin ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
81 Grade C / 100

Mixed Health Record

How is this score calculated? →
Latest inspection
August 13, 2026 · 10 findings · 5 critical
Routine - Food
View inspection data
Need help reading this?
Newest inspection first. Red dots matter most.

The score is the shortcut, but the inspection timeline is the proof. Start with the newest visit, then scan for repeat critical or major findings.

Critical
Highest-priority rows.
Major
Worth checking for repeats.
Minor
Usually lower-risk context.
Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
1
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on August 13, 2026 shows 8 observation rows: 5 critical, 1 major, and 2 minor.

Official record

DBPR source + data confidence

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Inspector notes
8
Coverage note
Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL turns public DBPR records into a scan-friendly timeline. Use the official DBPR link when you want to verify the newest inspection at the source.

What you’ll see here
  • •Inspector notes appear inline when available.
  • •The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
Map + verification

Open the place or verify the record

Open in Google Maps ↗ Open in Apple Maps ↗
DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

Official DBPR inspection report ↗
  • Disposition: Administrative complaint recommended
  • [02D-03-4] Label on a food item prepared and packaged onsite for customer self-service does not include product identity/description, date product was packaged and name and address of the establishment that prepared and packaged the food. Beef sauce not properly labeled with required information. Operator labeled items properly.
  • [01B-01-4] Dented/rusted cans present. 2 cans of tomatoes and 1 can of powdered milk. See stop sale.
  • [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Reach in cooler cook line, cooked beef (44F cold holding). Per operator removed from cooler for approximately 5 minutes. Per operator not prepared or portioned today. Operator moved back into reach in cooler.
  • [35A-02-8] Live, small flying insects found. Approximately 3 live flying insects in kitchens area. Operator removed insect.
  • [41-05-4] Pesticide/insecticide labeled for household use only present in establishment. Multiple cans of raid stored in establishment. Operator removed items.
  • [16-55-4] Dishmachine not washing/rinsing properly. Dishmachine at 0ppm chlorine, advised operator to set up sanitizer at three compartment sink, 200 ppm quaternary. Dishmachine not actively being used today.
  • [08A-17-6] Raw animal foods not properly separated from one another based upon minimum required cooking temperature when stored in a freezer - not all products commercially packaged. Raw chicken stored over raw beef, not commercially packaged operator moved and properly stored.
  • [02C-04-5] Operator is not properly tracking/marking the number of days ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared onsite was held at refrigeration temperatures prior to freezing in order to properly date mark the food when it is thawed and held at refrigeration temperatures again. Observed cooked chicken dated from yesterdays date, date prepared and frozen August 10th, operator did not deduct prep date properly. Operator corrected, date marked August 11.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

DONA AREPA has some meaningful issues on record. Would you still eat here?

C record

This is where the context matters most — some people will still eat there, others will want cleaner inspections first.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.