🪰75,043 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

LA TERESITA

3248 W COLUMBUS DR, TAMPA, FL 336071851

License #3910617

🌮 Mexican/Latin ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Latest inspection
July 23, 2026 · 12 findings · 3 critical
Routine - Food
View inspection data
Need help reading this?
Newest inspection first. Red dots matter most.

The score is the shortcut, but the inspection timeline is the proof. Start with the newest visit, then scan for repeat critical or major findings.

Critical
Highest-priority rows.
Major
Worth checking for repeats.
Minor
Usually lower-risk context.
Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
1
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on July 23, 2026 shows 10 observation rows: 3 critical, 2 major, and 5 minor.

Official record

DBPR source + data confidence

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Inspector notes
10
Coverage note
Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL turns public DBPR records into a scan-friendly timeline. Use the official DBPR link when you want to verify the newest inspection at the source.

What you’ll see here
  • Inspector notes appear inline when available.
  • The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
Map + verification

Open the place or verify the record

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
  • [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. A container of sliced ham 47 F and sliced cheese 48 F stored on counter top at cook line. Operator moved to reach-in cooler.
  • [23-03-4] Nonfood-contact surface soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust. Hood filters soiled with accumulation of grease at cook lines.
  • [31B-04-4] No handwashing sign provided at a hand sink used by food employees. At dish machine area, food prep area and mens restroom at cafe dining area.
  • [08B-47-4] Food not stored at least 6 inches off of the floor. A case of raw pork rib stored on floor in walk-in freezer. Operator moved to shelf.
  • [22-08-4] Interior of microwave has accumulation of black substance/grease/food debris. On front cook line.
  • [29-42-4] Vacuum breaker missing at mop sink faucet or on fitting/splitter added to mop sink faucet. Vacuum breaker missing at hose bibb or on fitting/splitter added to hose bibb. Buy handwash sink at front cook line and by three-compartments sink in main kitchen.
  • [08A-04-5] Raw animal food stored over or with unwashed produce. Raw steak and raw eggs stored over cut peppers and onions in walk-in cooler. Operator rearranged items to prevent cross contamination at time of inspection.
  • [14-11-5] Equipment in poor repair. Ran dish machine multiple times, chlorine tested 0ppm. No warewashing in dish machine at time of inspection. three-compartments sink setup with chlorine sanitizer at time of inspection.
  • [02C-02-5] Ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared onsite and held more than 24 hours not properly date marked. Cooked pork shanks in walk-in cooler.
  • [31B-02-4] No paper towels or mechanical hand drying device provided at handwash sink. At sandwich station.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

LA TERESITA has some meaningful issues on record. Would you still eat here?

C record

This is where the context matters most — some people will still eat there, others will want cleaner inspections first.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.