LEGACY CAFE

Name: LEGACY CAFE
Address: 710 S TAMPA AVE, ORLANDO, FL, 32805, US
Rating: 74.5

710 S TAMPA AVE, ORLANDO, FL 32805

License #5815845

☕ Café/Breakfast ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate

74.5 Grade C / 100

Mixed Health Record

How is this score calculated? →

Quick take

LEGACY CAFE in ORLANDO currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 74.5 out of 100 — a C grade — a noticeable pattern of violations across recent inspections. This restaurant has 3 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on March 13, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 24 total violations — 5 critical, 5 major, 14 minor.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Read latest inspection ↓ Open official DBPR ↗ Compare nearby ↓

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.

Inspections on file

Clean inspections

Callback visits

Latest clean pass

None on file yet

The latest inspection on March 13, 2026 included 1 critical violation, 1 major, and 7 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR

Inspection coverage

100%

Imported observations

Coverage note

Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here

•Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
•When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.

Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

Open in Google Maps ↗ Open in Apple Maps ↗

DBPR

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

Disposition: Administrative complaint recommended
[21-12-4] Wet wiping cloth not stored in sanitizing solution between uses. Wet cloth on cutting board at cook line
[41-15-5] Wiping cloth solution exceeding the maximum concentration allowed stored in a location that could result in the cross contamination of food, equipment, utensils, linens, single-service, or single-use articles. Sanitizing bucket over 500ppm Quat.
[52-04-5] Establishment advertised a specific fish on the menu/menu board but served another type of fish. Facility is advertising Catfish on menus and serving Swai per owner.
[31B-04-4] No handwashing sign provided at a hand sink used by food employees. Hand sink at cook line
[10-07-4] In-use utensil stored in standing water less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Utensils in water at cook line at 110f
[23-03-4] Nonfood-contact surface soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust. Fan covers in walk in cooler
[02D-03-4] Label on a food item prepared and packaged onsite for customer self-service does not include product identity/description, date product was packaged and name and address of the establishment that prepared and packaged the food. Oreo pudding, banana pudding and cakes in display cooler by drink cooler at counter for grab n go with no labeling on items Owner had all items placed in cooler behind front counter to serve to customers
[14-09-4] Cutting board has cut marks and is no longer cleanable. Make table cooler at cook line
[42-01-4] Wet mop not stored in a manner to allow the mop to dry.

Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse