LUM THAI RESTAURANT

Name: LUM THAI RESTAURANT
Address: 6251 ARGYLE FOREST BLVD #102, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 32244, US
Rating: 89.4

6251 ARGYLE FOREST BLVD #102, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32244

License #2614855

🍽️ Thai/Vietnamese ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate

89.4 Grade B / 100

Solid Health Score

How is this score calculated? →

Quick take

LUM THAI RESTAURANT in JACKSONVILLE currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 89.4 out of 100 — a B grade — generally clean with some minor or moderate violations on record. This restaurant has 3 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on January 14, 2026. Across those visits, DBPR recorded 23 total findings; InspectFL has imported detailed violation rows for 17 of them so far.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Read latest inspection ↓ Open official DBPR ↗ Compare nearby ↓

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.

Inspections on file

Clean inspections

Callback visits

Latest clean pass

September 2, 2025

The latest inspection on January 14, 2026 included 2 critical violations, 1 major, and 5 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR

Inspection coverage

Imported observations

Coverage note

Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here

•This page still shows the official DBPR violation record, even when inspector note text has not been imported yet.
•The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero imported notes.

Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

Open in Google Maps ↗ Open in Apple Maps ↗

DBPR

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

Inspector notes not yet imported — showing violation categories below.

Disposition: Administrative complaint recommended
TCS food held above 41°F when cold-held, below 135°F when hot-held, or not cooled within required timeframes. The most-cited High Priority category in our current scraped dataset.
Raw animal food stored over or with ready-to-eat food, food stored on the floor, food stored uncovered, and improper storage by minimum cooking temperature.
Cutting boards, equipment, and storage in poor repair — cut marks, ice buildup, rust, missing handles on dispensing utensils.
No chemical test kit available for the sanitizer in use; dishmachine maintenance issues, label residue on cleaned containers, lime scale buildup.
Non-food-contact surfaces (gaskets, shelves, equipment exteriors, door handles) soiled with grease, debris, dirt, slime, or dust.
Equipment and utensils stored wet (wet nesting), stored uninverted, or stored in dirty drawers/racks after cleaning.
Single-service items (cups, plates, utensils, straws) stored improperly, exposed to contamination, or reused after intended single use.
Bathrooms not properly enclosed with self-closing doors, missing covered receptacles in women's restrooms, doors left open or self-closers broken.

Specific inspector observations for this inspection are available in the official DBPR report, but the direct DBPR visit link is missing for this record.

Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse