MAPLE AND ASH FLOOR 1

Name: MAPLE AND ASH FLOOR 1
Address: 652 NE 2 AVE STE H160-H260, MIAMI, FL, 33132, US
Rating: 84.5

652 NE 2 AVE STE H160-H260, MIAMI, FL 33132

License #2338361

84.5 Grade C / 100

Mixed Health Record

How is this score calculated? →

Quick take

MAPLE AND ASH FLOOR 1 in MIAMI currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 84.5 out of 100 — a C grade — a noticeable pattern of violations across recent inspections. This restaurant has 4 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on May 20, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 24 total violations — 5 critical, 12 major, 7 minor.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Read latest inspection ↓ Open official DBPR ↗ Compare nearby ↓

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.

Inspections on file

Clean inspections

Callback visits

Latest clean pass

None on file yet

The latest inspection on May 20, 2026 included 2 critical violations, 3 major, and 1 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR

Inspection coverage

100%

Imported observations

Coverage note

Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here

•Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
•When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.

Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

Open in Google Maps ↗ Open in Apple Maps ↗

DBPR

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
[50-09-4] Current Hotel and Restaurant license not displayed.
[03G-05-5] Fish packaged in the establishment using a reduced oxygen method not bearing a label indicating that it is to be kept frozen until time of use. Observed raw Tuna Tuna and groupers fish inside walk in cooler.
[01B-03-5] Stop Sale issued due to adulteration of food product. Fish packaged in the establishment using a reduced oxygen method not bearing a label indicating that it is to be kept frozen until time of use. Observed raw Tuna and groupers fish inside walk in cooler. See stop sale.
[31A-11-4] Handwash sink used for purposes other than handwashing. Observed metal container inside hand wash sink near oven front. Operator removed during inspection.
[31B-02-4] No paper towels or mechanical hand drying device provided at handwash sink. Operator provided during inspection.
[03G-50-1] Operator is doing a special process, conducting reduced oxygen packaging, cooking time/temperature control for safety food to a time and temperature combination lesser than those in the Food Code or operating a molluscan shellfish tank for human consumption without a HACCP plan approved by the Division of Hotels and Restaurants. Observed: Operator is doing a special process, conducting reduced oxygen packaging, combination lesser than those in the Food Code or operating a molluscan shellfish tank for human consumption without a HACCP plan approved by the Division of Hotels and Restaurants. Operator vacuum packages raw tuna and groupers fish. without an approved HACCP plan.

Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse