Sign in to watch restaurants and track them on your watchlist.
Failing Health Score
How is this score calculated? → Need help reading this? Newest inspection first. Red dots matter most.
The score is the shortcut, but the inspection timeline is the proof. Start with the newest visit, then scan for repeat critical or major findings.
MIMOSAS in MELBOURNE currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 67.2 out of 100 — an F grade — a serious pattern of repeat or critical violations. This restaurant has 3 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on October 7, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 20 total violations — 4 critical, 4 major, 12 minor.
Start with the newest inspection
Use the score as a shortcut, then verify the latest DBPR record and nearby options.
What stands out in this inspection history
The latest inspection on October 7, 2026 shows 13 observation rows: 4 critical, 3 major, and 6 minor.
DBPR source + data confidenceWhat’s powering this page
InspectFL turns public DBPR records into a scan-friendly timeline. Use the official DBPR link when you want to verify the newest inspection at the source. InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When exact inspector notes are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.
- •Inspector notes appear inline when available.
- •The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
Open the place or verify the recordSee the place, then share or verify
What do locals think?
Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then add what you actually saw.
Would you eat here?
MIMOSAS has a rough inspection history. Would you risk it?
A rough inspection history changes the conversation. This vote is a quick read on community trust.
One vote per device. Results update after you vote.
*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.
Inspection History
Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.
Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.
- Disposition: Warning Issued
- [01B-13-4] Stop Sale issued due to food not being in a wholesome, sound condition. 3 jugs of juice squeezed on 10/6 and today is 10/7
- [41-10-4] Toxic substance/chemical improperly stored. Stainless steel cleaner on top of main ice machine in kitchen. Medicine on top of 2 door glass reach in cooler and microwave
- [52-10-4] Establishment advertised fresh juice, but juice was not prepared within 12 hours of sale and/or juice contains additives. 3 jugs of juice squeezed on 10/6 and today is 10/7
- [35A-06-4] Accumulation of dead or trapped birds, insects, rodents, or other pests, in control devices. One small fly insect trapped by back door is store above syrup bottles
- [08B-47-4] Food not stored at least 6 inches off of the floor. Fully cooked breakfast sausage patties in boxes and raw chicken. Operator did place raw chicken off of floor Walk in freezer and walk in cooler
- [16-46-4] Old labels stuck to food containers after cleaning. Made in house ranch dressing that was dated 9/22. Operator states that is a old label and the dressing was made yesterday 10/6
- [13-03-4] Employee with no hair restraint while engaging in food preparation. Employee on cook line not having hair restraint
- [02B-01-5] Menu does not identify which items contain raw or undercooked animal foods covered by the consumer advisory. Eggs Benedict not identified
- [03F-10-5] No written procedures available for use of time as a public health control to hold time/temperature control for safety food. Inspector provided blank written procedures paper work to operator
- [08A-05-6] Raw animal food stored over/not properly separated from ready-to-eat food. Observed grilled station at pancake/ waffle station. Raw chicken over ready to eat items. Operator place raw chicken on the bottom and ready to eat items on top
- [02D-01-5] Working containers of food removed from original container not identified by common name. Sugar, brown sugar, salt
- [31B-04-4] No handwashing sign provided at a hand sink used by food employees. Both hand wash sink in the back of the house. Hand wash sink behind front bar. And hand wash sink in public bathrooms.
- [12A-13-4] Employee handled soiled equipment or utensils and then engaged in food preparation, handled clean equipment or utensils, or touched unwrapped single-service items without washing hands. Observed dishwasher was touching clean equipment coming out of dish washer machine without washing hands before touching clean equipment Inspector reeducated employees to wash hands before touching clean equipment coming out dish washer machine
Own or manage a business?
FairScore is a separate free beta for business owners who want a fairer way to understand online reviewer behavior.
FairScore does not change InspectFL scores, inspection data, rankings, or coverage.
More places worth comparing
If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.
Similar Café/Breakfast in MELBOURNE
Use these as a same-category comparison set so you can judge this score against nearby alternatives, not in isolation.
Other options in MELBOURNE
If you're just looking for a better place nearby, start here and compare the current scores before you decide where to go next.
Join the discussion
Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.
Add your take in under a minute
Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.
Enter the 6-digit code sent to
Helpful comments beat hot takes.
Loading comments…
No comments yet — be the first person to add useful context.