PASEO VILLAGE CENTER-TIKI

Name: PASEO VILLAGE CENTER-TIKI
Address: 11611 PASEO GRANDE BLVD, FORT MYERS, FL, 33912, US
Rating: 88.7

11611 PASEO GRANDE BLVD, FORT MYERS, FL 33912

License #4606177

🍺 Bar/Pub ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate

88.7 Grade B / 100

Solid Health Score

How is this score calculated? →

Quick take

PASEO VILLAGE CENTER-TIKI in FORT MYERS currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 88.7 out of 100 — a B grade — generally clean with some minor or moderate violations on record. This restaurant has 2 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on March 26, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 13 total violations — 2 critical, 3 major, 8 minor.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Read latest inspection ↓ Open official DBPR ↗ Compare nearby ↓

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.

Inspections on file

Clean inspections

Callback visits

Latest clean pass

None on file yet

The latest inspection on March 26, 2026 shows 12 observation rows: 2 critical, 2 major, and 8 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR

Inspection coverage

100%

Inspector notes

Coverage note

Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When exact inspector notes are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here

•Inspector notes appear inline when available.
•The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.

Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

Open in Google Maps ↗ Open in Apple Maps ↗

DBPR

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
[22-42-4] Chlorine sanitizer not at proper minimum strength for manual warewashing. Do not use equipment/utensils not properly sanitized. Observed 0 ppm chlorine at bar. Employee forgot to add sanitizer. Operator added sanitizer. Rechecked concentration at 100 ppm.
[21-10-4] Soiled dry wiping cloth in use. Operator removed soiled cloth.
[14-01-5] Bowl or other container with no handle used to dispense pica di gallo. Operator removed cup.
[10-17-4] In-use knife/knives stored in cracks between pieces of equipment.
[31B-02-4] No paper towels or mechanical hand drying device provided at handwash sink at outside bar.
[31A-11-4] Handwash sink used for purposes other than handwashing. Observed handwash sinks at bar used to fill containers and dump ice.
[51-11-4] Carbon dioxide/helium tanks not adequately secured. Operator secured tanks.
[08B-49-4] Employee personal food not properly identified and segregated from food to be served to the public. Operator placed employee food on bottom shelf.
[21-38-4] Wiping cloth sanitizing solution stored on the floor. Operator placed bucket on shelving.
[24-08-4] Equipment and utensils not properly air-dried - wet nesting. Observed employee drying containers with towel.
[41-27-4] Wiping cloth sanitizer solution exceeds the maximum concentration allowed. Observed chlorine concentration at 200+ppm. Operator added more water.
[12B-13-4] Opened employee beverage container in a cold holding unit with food to be served to customers. Operator removed employee beverage.

Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse