🪰526,489 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

PRIME 92 FIFTY

9250 MAPLE VALLEY RD, BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33473

License #6023071

🥩 Steakhouse ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Quick take

PRIME 92 FIFTY in BOYNTON BEACH currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 85.9 out of 100 — a B grade — generally clean with some minor or moderate violations on record. This restaurant has 2 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on March 27, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 14 total violations — 6 critical, 1 major, 7 minor.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
2
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on March 27, 2026 shows 10 observation rows: 5 critical, 1 major, and 4 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Inspector notes
14
Coverage note
Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When exact inspector notes are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Inspector notes appear inline when available.
  • The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
  • [08A-05-6] Raw animal food stored over/not properly separated from ready-to-eat food. Observed in 2 drawers sauté cooler pooled eggs stored over bags of cooked couscous. Employee stored correctly.
  • [02D-01-5] Working containers of food (sugar) removed from original container not identified by common name.
  • [16-62-1] No measuring device available for measuring utensil surface temperature when using hot water as sanitizer in a dishmachine.
  • [24-05-4] Clean glasses, cups, bowls, plates, pots and pans not stored inverted or in a protected manner. Observed on clean dish racks bowls, plates not stored inverted or in a protected manner.
  • [29-42-4] Vacuum breaker missing at mop sink faucet or on fitting/splitter added to mop sink faucet.
  • [12A-29-4] Employee touched soiled surface and then engaged in food preparation, handled clean equipment or utensils, or touched unwrapped single-service items without washing hands. Observed employee handling garbage cans then prepared tempura batter. Employee washed hands.
  • [13-07-4] Employee wearing jewelry other than a plain ring on their hands/arms while preparing food. Observed employee wearing a watch on left wrist while preparing food.
  • [03B-01-6] Time/temperature control for safety food, other than whole meat roast, hot held at less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Observed in steam table mashed potatoes (125F - Hot Holding) per employee held out of temperature less than 30 minutes. Employee tuned up steam table temperature. Observed a pan of sauté onions sauté onions (65F - Hot Holding) stored in front of flat to grill. Per employee held out of temperature less than 30 minutes. Employee placed in pan and reheated on the stove.
  • [08A-20-5] Raw animal foods not properly separated from each other in holding unit based upon minimum required cooking temperature. Observed in 2 drawers below char grill raw chicken breast stored behind raw salmon. Employee stored correctly.
  • [13-04-4] Employee with no beard guard/restraint while engaging in food preparation.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

PRIME 92 FIFTY looks fairly solid on paper. Would you eat here?

B record

Solid overall, with enough history that people may still weigh the details differently.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.