ROCOTO PERUVIAN GRILL

Name: ROCOTO PERUVIAN GRILL
Address: 1612 S CYPRESS, POMPANO BEACH, FL, 33060, US
Rating: 70.4

1612 S CYPRESS, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33060

License #1612233

🫔 Latin American ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate

70.4 Grade C / 100

Mixed Health Record

How is this score calculated? →

Quick take

ROCOTO PERUVIAN GRILL in POMPANO BEACH currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 70.4 out of 100 — a C grade — a noticeable pattern of violations across recent inspections. This restaurant has 3 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on June 18, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 19 total violations — 3 critical, 7 major, 9 minor.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Read latest inspection ↓ Open official DBPR ↗ Compare nearby ↓

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.

Inspections on file

Clean inspections

Callback visits

Latest clean pass

None on file yet

The latest inspection on June 18, 2026 shows 9 observation rows: 2 critical, 4 major, and 3 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR

Inspection coverage

67%

Inspector notes

Coverage note

Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When exact inspector notes are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here

•Inspector notes appear inline when available.
•The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.

Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

Open in Google Maps ↗ Open in Apple Maps ↗

DBPR

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

Inspector notes not available yet — showing violation categories below.

Disposition: Warning Issued
Ready-to-eat TCS food not properly date marked, working containers not labeled with common name, and menu disclosure issues for raw/undercooked foods.
TCS food held above 41°F when cold-held, below 135°F when hot-held, or not cooled within required timeframes. The most-cited High Priority category in our current scraped dataset.
In-use utensils stored improperly between uses — in standing water below 135°F, on equipment door handles, or in unsanitary positions.
Employee personal beverage container in food prep area; employees handling food or clean equipment without washing hands first or after touching soiled surfaces.
No chemical test kit available for the sanitizer in use; dishmachine maintenance issues, label residue on cleaned containers, lime scale buildup.
Equipment and utensils stored wet (wet nesting), stored uninverted, or stored in dirty drawers/racks after cleaning.
Handwash sinks used for non-handwashing purposes, blocked, or missing soap, paper towels, or signage.
Employee personal items, cosmetics, or toiletries stored in or above food prep areas, food, or clean equipment.
Establishment advertised one type of fish or food but served another; misrepresenting fresh juice or imitation crab; identity of food product misrepresented.

Specific inspector observations for this inspection are available in the official DBPR report, but the direct DBPR visit link is missing for this record.

Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse