🪰526,489 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

SHAN KISHI JAPANESE RESTAURANT

11275 US 98 W #4, MIRAMAR BEACH, FL 32550

License #7602139

🍱 Japanese/Sushi ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
91.2 Grade B / 100

Solid Health Score

How is this score calculated? →
Quick take

SHAN KISHI JAPANESE RESTAURANT in MIRAMAR BEACH currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 91.2 out of 100 — a B grade — generally clean with some minor or moderate violations on record. This restaurant has 2 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on March 4, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 15 total violations — 5 major, 10 minor.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Read latest inspection ↓ Open official DBPR ↗ Compare nearby ↓
Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
2
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on March 4, 2026 shows 8 observation rows: no critical rows, 3 major, and 5 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Inspector notes
15
Coverage note
Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When exact inspector notes are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • •Inspector notes appear inline when available.
  • •The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

Open in Google Maps ↗ Open in Apple Maps ↗
DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
  • [14-69-4] Ice buildup in walk-in freezer on floor and ceiling.
  • [31A-09-4] Handwash sink not accessible for employee use at all times at sushi bar. Trash can blocking sink. Employee removed trash can from sink.
  • [16-33-4] Chemical test kit not used to ensure proper sanitization of equipment and utensils when using a chemical sanitizer. Dish machine chlorine sanitizer 10 ppm.
  • [22-20-5] Accumulation of black/green mold-like substance in the interior of the ice machine/bin.
  • [16-29-4] Dishes not washed, rinsed and sanitized using three distinct steps. Employee washing dishes rinsing dishes and placing them on dish shelf to dry. Inspector had employee set up 3 compartment sink with wash, rinse, sanitize during inspection. Manager asked employee to re wash, rinse and sanitize dishes.
  • [06-01-5] Time/temperature control for safety food thawed in an improper manner. Thawing- pork loin 26F at room temp. Must thaw under cold running water.
  • [31A-11-4] Handwash sink used for purposes other than handwashing at sushi bar. Plate stored in sink. Employee removed plate from sink.
  • [16-55-4] Dishmachine not washing/rinsing properly. Must wash, rinse and sanitize all dishware, equipment and utensils in three-compartment sink until dishmachine is functioning properly. Chlorine sanitizer 10 ppm. Manager set up 3 compartment sink with chlorine sanitizer.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

SHAN KISHI JAPANESE RESTAURANT looks fairly solid on paper. Would you eat here?

B record

Solid overall, with enough history that people may still weigh the details differently.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.