TASTY THAI
7954 N WICKHAM RD STE 121, MELBOURNE, FL 32940
License #1507032
🥙 Mediterranean ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurateSign in to watch restaurants and track them on your watchlist.
Solid Health Score
How is this score calculated? → Need help reading this? Newest inspection first. Red dots matter most.
The score is the shortcut, but the inspection timeline is the proof. Start with the newest visit, then scan for repeat critical or major findings.
TASTY THAI in MELBOURNE currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 87 out of 100 — a B grade — generally clean with some minor or moderate violations on record. This restaurant has one inspection on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on August 5, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 9 total violations — 4 major, 5 minor.
Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern
The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.
What stands out in this inspection history
The latest inspection on August 5, 2026 shows 9 observation rows: no critical rows, 4 major, and 5 minor.
DBPR source + data confidenceWhat’s powering this page
InspectFL turns public DBPR records into a scan-friendly timeline. Use the official DBPR link when you want to verify the newest inspection at the source. InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When exact inspector notes are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.
- •Inspector notes appear inline when available.
- •The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
Open the place or verify the recordSee the place, then share or verify
*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.
Inspection History
Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.
Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.
- Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
- [02B-02-5] Raw/undercooked animal food offered and establishment has no written consumer advisory. Raw animal foods must be fully cooked prior to service. Establishments does have the consumer advisory just need to put up the verbiage to show customers
- [11-26-1] No proof provided that food employees are informed of their responsibility to report to the person in charge information about their health and activities related to foodborne illnesses. Operator had employee read and sign agreement doing inspection
- [21-23-4] Establishment using sponges on cleaned and sanitized, or in-use food-contact surface. Observed steel wool scrubber on wok station. Operator removed raw discarded the steel wool
- [23-03-4] Nonfood-contact surface soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust. Hood vents above wok station
- [31A-11-4] Handwash sink used for purposes other than handwashing. Hand wash sink next to Cooke line had a pitcher of water stored in the sink. Operator removed it
- [36-34-5] Ceiling/ceiling tiles/vents soiled with accumulated food debris, grease, dust, or mold-like substance. Ceiling vent in kitchen soiled with dust
- [32-04-4] Bathroom located inside establishment not completely enclosed with tight-fitting, self-closing doors. Female bathroom door
- [03F-10-5] No written procedures available for use of time as a public health control to hold time/temperature control for safety food. For sushi rice. Inspector emailed operator TPHC procedures paperwork
- [36-68-5] Hood ventilation system inadequate as evidenced by grease accumulation on walls/ceiling. Hoods vents above wok station
What do locals think?
Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.
Would you eat here?
TASTY THAI looks fairly solid on paper. Would you eat here?
Solid overall, with enough history that people may still weigh the details differently.
One vote per device. Results update after you vote.
More places worth comparing
If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.
Similar Mediterranean in MELBOURNE
Use these as a same-category comparison set so you can judge this score against nearby alternatives, not in isolation.
Other options in MELBOURNE
If you're just looking for a better place nearby, start here and compare the current scores before you decide where to go next.
Join the discussion
Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.
Add your take in under a minute
Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.
Enter the 6-digit code sent to
Helpful comments beat hot takes.
Loading comments…
No comments yet — be the first person to add useful context.