🪰514,879 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

JA RAMEN AND CURRY

24065 PEACHLAND BLVD UNIT 103, PORT CHARLOTTE, FL 33954

License #1801982

🍱 Japanese/Sushi ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Quick take

JA RAMEN AND CURRY in PORT CHARLOTTE currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 86 out of 100 — a B grade — generally clean with some minor or moderate violations on record. This restaurant has 2 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on March 24, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 14 total violations — 1 critical, 5 major, 8 minor.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
2
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on March 24, 2026 included 1 critical violation, 2 major, and 6 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Imported observations
14
Coverage note
Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
  • When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Inspection Completed - No Further Action
  • [10-04-5] In-use utensil for non-time/temperature control for safety food not stored in a clean, protected location. Observed the scoop used for the ice machine stored unprotected on a soiled surface. The operator removed the ice scoop.
  • [51-11-4] Carbon dioxide tank not adequately secured in the bag in box storage area.
  • [53B-09-4] Required employee training provided by a third-party employee training program and operator unable to provide original certificate for employees trained. Observed
  • [31B-03-4] No soap provided at handwash sink behind the front counter. The operator provided soap for the hand sink.
  • [16-21-4] Accumulation of debris on the top exterior of warewashing machine.
  • [14-01-5] Bowl or other container with no handle used to dispense food. Observed a plastic scoop with no handle used as a scoop for corn starch. The operator removed the scoop.
  • [08A-05-6] Raw animal food stored over/not properly separated from ready-to-eat food. Observed raw chicken stored over matcha cheesecake in the reach in cooler at the entrance to the kitchen. The operator properly stored the raw chicken. Observed raw pork stored over cooked chicken dumplings in the walk in cooler. The operator properly stored the above raw foods.
  • [25-05-4] Single-service articles improperly stored. Observed a case of styrofoam cups stored on the floor in front of the soda dispenser. The operator properly stored the cups.
  • [40-06-5] Employee personal items stored in or above a food preparation area, food, clean equipment and utensils, or single-service items. Observed employee personal stored on a shelf above a food preparation surface on the cook line. The employee properly stored the belongings.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

JA RAMEN AND CURRY looks fairly solid on paper. Would you eat here?

B record

Solid overall, with enough history that people may still weigh the details differently.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.