LITTLE ASIA
855 PALM BAY RD NE STE 101, W MELBOURNE, FL 32904
License #1506742
🍱 Japanese/Sushi ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurateSign in to watch restaurants and track them on your watchlist.
Mixed Health Record
How is this score calculated? →LITTLE ASIA in W MELBOURNE currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 70.2 out of 100 — a C grade — a noticeable pattern of violations across recent inspections. This restaurant has 4 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on February 17, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 50 total violations — 14 critical, 15 major, 21 minor.
Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern
The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.
What stands out in this inspection history
The latest inspection on February 17, 2026 shows 12 observation rows: 4 critical, 1 major, and 7 minor.
What’s powering this page
InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When exact inspector notes are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.
- •Inspector notes appear inline when available.
- •The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
See the place, then share or verify
*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.
Inspection History
Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.
Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.
- Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
- [02C-02-5] Ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared onsite and held more than 24 hours not properly date marked. Cooked whole duck made two days ago not dated.
- [13-03-4] Employee with no hair restraint while engaging in food preparation. Employee cooking with no hair restraints, corrected without prompting.
- [14-05-4] Cardboard used to line food-contact shelves. Cardboard used to line top shelves above make tables.
- [25-02-4] Unwrapped single-service utensils not presented so that only the handles are touched.plastic ware for customers mixed nor presented handle first in plastic bin on front counter.
- [23-03-4] Nonfood-contact surface soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust. Three door reach in cooler gaskets soiled with mold like substance. Vent hood covers soiled with grease.
- [38-11-4] Fifty (50) foot-candles of light not provided at a food working surface or where safety is a factor. Six lights above woks no longer working.
- [36-01-4] Floor not cleaned when the least amount of food is exposed. Flooring under dry storage shelves soiled with old food debris.
- [01B-01-4] Dented/rusted cans present. See stop sale. Soy sauce 60 fl oz dented at bottom.
- [08A-04-5] Raw animal food stored over or with unwashed produce. Raw shelled eggs stored over ready to eat broccoli in make table.
- [03F-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food identified in the written procedure as a food held using time as a public health control has no time marking and the time removed from temperature control cannot be determined. Chicken on cook line for two hours without a time listed on container.
- [08A-05-6] Raw animal food stored over/not properly separated from ready-to-eat food. Raw chicken wings stored over ready to eat sauces in walk in cooler.
- [08B-38-4] Food stored on floor. Full oil box stored on floor at woks. Case of raw beef stored on floor in walk in cooler.
What do locals think?
Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.
Would you eat here?
LITTLE ASIA has some meaningful issues on record. Would you still eat here?
This is where the context matters most — some people will still eat there, others will want cleaner inspections first.
One vote per device. Results update after you vote.
More places worth comparing
If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.
Similar Japanese/Sushi in Brevard County
Use these as a same-category comparison set so you can judge this score against nearby alternatives, not in isolation.
Other options in W MELBOURNE
If you're just looking for a better place nearby, start here and compare the current scores before you decide where to go next.
Join the discussion
Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.
Add your take in under a minute
Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.
Enter the 6-digit code sent to
Helpful comments beat hot takes.
Loading comments…
No comments yet — be the first person to add useful context.