🪰526,489 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

SNAPPERS FISH AND CHICKEN

4037 NW 19 ST, LAUDERHILL, FL 33313

License #1623176

🦞 Seafood ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Quick take

SNAPPERS FISH AND CHICKEN in LAUDERHILL currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 91.1 out of 100 — a B grade — generally clean with some minor or moderate violations on record. This restaurant has 2 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on February 19, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 15 total violations — 3 critical, 2 major, 10 minor.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
2
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on February 19, 2026 shows 6 observation rows: 1 critical, 1 major, and 4 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Inspector notes
15
Coverage note
Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When exact inspector notes are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Inspector notes appear inline when available.
  • The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Disposition: Administrative complaint recommended
  • [13-03-4] Employee with no hair restraint while engaging in food preparation. Observed one employee preparing food not wearing hair restraint.
  • [23-03-4] Nonfood-contact surface soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust. Observed hood filters at cook line soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust.
  • [29-49-6] Standing water in bottom of reach-in-cooler. Observed standing water in low boy cooler at cook line .
  • [41-17-4] Spray bottle containing toxic substance not labeled. At front counter unlabeled bottle containing bleach. Operator labeled during the inspection.
  • [08B-38-4] Food stored on floor. Observed in walk in cooler , bottle of garlic sauce stored on floor. Operator elevated during the inspection.
  • [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. 1.Observed at cook line , fried wings (49F - Cold Holding). Per operator wings was out of temperature for less than one hour. Introduced Time as a Public Heath Control to Manager. Provided manager with form. Manger completed form and time stamped wings during the inspection. 2. One door cooler at cook line , cooked mushrooms (50F - Cold Holding). Per operator item was not prepared or portioned today . Item was left in cooler over night exceeding 6 hours. Operator discarded during the inspection.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

SNAPPERS FISH AND CHICKEN looks fairly solid on paper. Would you eat here?

B record

Solid overall, with enough history that people may still weigh the details differently.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.