🪰75,275 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

WING IT

660 E EAU GALLIE BLVD STE 103, INDIAN HARBOUR BEACH, FL 32903

License #1506562

🍗 Wings/Chicken ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Latest inspection
July 9, 2026 · 14 findings · 4 critical
Routine - Food
View inspection data
Need help reading this?
Newest inspection first. Red dots matter most.

The score is the shortcut, but the inspection timeline is the proof. Start with the newest visit, then scan for repeat critical or major findings.

Critical
Highest-priority rows.
Major
Worth checking for repeats.
Minor
Usually lower-risk context.
Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
1
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on July 9, 2026 shows 12 observation rows: 4 critical, 4 major, and 4 minor.

Official record

DBPR source + data confidence

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Inspector notes
12
Coverage note
Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL turns public DBPR records into a scan-friendly timeline. Use the official DBPR link when you want to verify the newest inspection at the source.

What you’ll see here
  • Inspector notes appear inline when available.
  • The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
Map + verification

Open the place or verify the record

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Disposition: Warning Issued
  • [10-01-5] In-use utensil in non-time/temperature control for safety food not stored with handle above top of food within a closed container. Handle for flour is touching the food
  • [41-10-4] Toxic substance/chemical improperly stored. Sanitizer bottles stored above paper towels. Soap containers stored above spices and breading. Employee moved
  • [51-13-4] No Heimlich maneuver/choking sign posted. Emailed poster
  • [53B-01-5] No proof of required state approved employee training provided for any employees. To order approved program food safety material, call DBPR contracted provider: Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association (SafeStaff) 866-372-7233.
  • [29-42-4] Vacuum breaker missing at mop sink faucet or on fitting/splitter added to mop sink faucet. No vacuum breaker installed on non-chemical side of splitter at mop sink
  • [02D-01-5] Working containers of food removed from original container not identified by common name. Flour bin not labeled
  • [31A-09-4] Handwash sink not accessible for employee use at all times. Containers used for cleaning fryer oil are blocking the hand wash sink next to the triple sink
  • [11-26-1] No proof provided that food employees are informed of their responsibility to report to the person in charge information about their health and activities related to foodborne illnesses.
  • [16-37-1] No chemical test kit provided when using sanitizer at three-compartment sink/warewashing machine or wiping cloths.
  • [12A-12-4] Employee switched from working with raw food to ready-to-eat food without washing hands. Employee handled raw chicken with gloved hands. Removed gloves and handled plastic condiment containers without washing hands
  • [50-09-4] Current Hotel and Restaurant license not displayed.
  • [08A-05-6] Raw animal food stored over/not properly separated from ready-to-eat food. In lower holding area of make line. Raw chicken stored above buttermilk, carrots and celery. Employee moved
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

WING IT has some meaningful issues on record. Would you still eat here?

C record

This is where the context matters most — some people will still eat there, others will want cleaner inspections first.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.