🪰514,879 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

WOODLANDBURGER

12806 SW SR 45, ARCHER, FL 32618

License #1103798

🍔 Burgers ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Quick take

WOODLANDBURGER in ARCHER currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 89.1 out of 100 — a B grade — generally clean with some minor or moderate violations on record. This restaurant has 2 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on December 19, 2025. Across those visits, inspectors documented 17 total violations — 4 critical, 1 major, 12 minor.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
2
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on December 19, 2025 included 2 critical violations, 1 major, and 3 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Imported observations
17
Coverage note
Inspector notes shown when available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Imported DBPR observations appear directly inside inspection entries when available.
  • When note coverage is missing, the official violation record still stays visible.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Administrative complaint recommended
  • [42-01-4] Wet mop not stored in a manner to allow the mop to dry. Two wet mops stored down inside buckets near mop sink.
  • [41-17-4] Spray bottle containing toxic substance not labeled. 1. Stray bottle containing blue liquid missing label on shelf near mop sink. 2. Container labeled as "Lemon Pepper" containing soap on shelf above three-compartment sink.
  • [13-07-4] Employee wearing jewelry other than a plain ring on their hands/arms while preparing food. Two employees with bracelets on wrist handling food.
  • [14-45-4] Cardboard used to line nonfood-contact shelves. 1. Cardboard lining shelving inside walk-in cooler. 2. Cardboard used to line shelf in kitchen near reach-in freezers. 3. Cardboard used as dividers inside pan containing condiment cups.
  • [08A-04-5] Raw animal food stored over or with unwashed produce. 1. Case of raw shell eggs stored on shelf above box containing unwashed lettuce inside walk-in cooler. 2. Pans containing raw ground hamburger meat stored on shelf above mesh bags containing unwashed onions inside walk-in cooler. Manager moved all raw meats away from produce during this inspection.
  • [12A-18-4] Employee dried hands on clothes/apron/soiled towel after washing. Employee dried gloved hands on visibly soiled cloth, then continued to handle hamburger buns with the same gloved hands. Inspector had employee stop, wash hands, and put on new gloves before continuing to handle food. Only one handwash sink located in corner of kitchen, Inspector recommends adding an additional handwash sink at other side of cookline.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

WOODLANDBURGER looks fairly solid on paper. Would you eat here?

B record

Solid overall, with enough history that people may still weigh the details differently.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.