Sign in to watch restaurants and track them on your watchlist.
Failing Health Score
How is this score calculated? โ Need help reading this? Newest inspection first. Red dots matter most.
The score is the shortcut, but the inspection timeline is the proof. Start with the newest visit, then scan for repeat critical or major findings.
CHOPSTICK EXPRESS INC in ST. PETERSBURG currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 0 out of 100 โ an F grade โ a serious pattern of repeat or critical violations. This restaurant has been inspected 7 times from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on September 9, 2026. Across those visits, inspectors documented 115 total violations โ 21 critical, 22 major, 72 minor.
Start with the newest inspection
Use the score as a shortcut, then verify the latest DBPR record and nearby options.
What stands out in this inspection history
The latest inspection on September 9, 2026 shows 23 observation rows: no critical rows, 6 major, and 17 minor.
DBPR source + data confidenceWhatโs powering this page
InspectFL turns public DBPR records into a scan-friendly timeline. Use the official DBPR link when you want to verify the newest inspection at the source. InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When exact inspector notes are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.
- โขInspector notes appear inline when available.
- โขThe official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
Open the place or verify the recordSee the place, then share or verify
What do locals think?
Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then add what you actually saw.
Would you eat here?
CHOPSTICK EXPRESS INC has a rough inspection history. Would you risk it?
A rough inspection history changes the conversation. This vote is a quick read on community trust.
One vote per device. Results update after you vote.
*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.
Inspection History
Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.
Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.
- Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
- [10-07-4] In-use utensil stored in standing water less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Multiple utensils seen in standing water held at (85F) on prep line across from flat top.
- [11-27-4] Establishment has no written procedures for employees to follow in response to a vomiting or diarrheal event where the vomit or diarrhea is discharged onto surfaces in the establishment. Inspector provided new poster to be posted in restaurant.
- [14-45-4] Cardboard used to line nonfood-contact shelves. Cardboard lining shelves above flat top cook station.
- [14-17-4] Walk-in cooler/freezer shelves with rust that has pitted the surface. Multiple shelves in walk-in coolerA and walk-in freezerA showed signs of rusting and pitting.
- [22-02-4] Food-contact surface soiled with food debris, mold-like substance or slime. Cutting boards had a lot of wear in kitchen along wall opposite of flat top.
- [23-24-4] Buildup of food debris/soil residue on equipment door handles. Build up of food residue on inside of handles throughout restaurant.
- [08B-12-5] Stored food not covered. Cooked food in walk in cooler lacked proper covering after cooling process was finished.
- [31A-11-4] Handwash sink used for purposes other than handwashing. Handwashing sink observed with dishes inside sink. Operator removed items on site.
- [33-02-4] Cardboard box used as garbage container. Cardboard box used as trash can near entrance of kitchen on floor.
- [36-32-5] Ceiling/ceiling tile shows damage or is in disrepair. Two tiles in disrepair over prep area. Tiles had insulation coming out of cracks.
- [36-24-5] Hole in or other damage to wall. Multiple walls throughout kitchen in disrepair.
- [42-01-4] Wet mop not stored in a manner to allow the mop to dry. Wet mop not hung to properly dry between uses.
- [51-13-4] No Heimlich maneuver/choking sign posted. Inspector provided new poster to be posted in restaurant.
- [12A-03-4] Employee washed hands in a sink other than an approved handwash sink. Witnessed operator wash hands in three compartment sink. Discussed proper handwashing techniques and the necessity for handwashing sinks being used.
- [21-09-4] Wet wiping cloths used for occasional spills on equipment food- and nonfood-contact surfaces not clean. Multiple used rags throughout kitchen seen without proper sanitizing solution present.
- [35B-04-4] Outer openings of establishment cannot be properly sealed when not in operation. Door to outside of kitchen lacked proper seal when shut. Door also had large amount of holes throughout metal.
- [36-34-5] Ceiling/ceiling tiles/vents soiled with accumulated food debris, grease, dust, or mold-like substance. Ceiling vents soiled with grease throughout kitchen.
- [41-04-4] Toxic substance/chemical on premise that is not required for the operation of establishment. Dog treats held over non packaged food in walk-in freezer.
- [02C-02-5] Ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared onsite and held more than 24 hours not properly date marked. Food prepared on site(chicken, beef and shrimp) not properly date marked. Communicated with operator who claimed all food was made Monday.
- [08B-38-4] Food stored on floor. Multiple food stored on floor throughout restaurant. (1) Bag of flour on floor in back prep area. (2) Containers of soy sauce on floor in walk-in cooler. (1) Container of soy sauce on floor near main cook line. (1) Container of unused cooking oil on floor under main cook line.
- [12B-07-4] Employee beverage container on a food preparation table or over/next to clean equipment/utensils. Employee drink seen on prep table closest to wok station.
- [02D-01-5] Working containers of food removed from original container not identified by common name. No sign of proper labels on all food items throughout restaurant. Container of unknown white substance not properly labeled in small back prep area.
- [23-03-4] Nonfood-contact surface soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust. Soiled gaskets throughout kitchen on reach-in coolers. Table under flat top in kitchen had large buildup of food residue and grease.
Own or manage a business?
FairScore is a separate free beta for business owners who want a fairer way to understand online reviewer behavior.
FairScore does not change InspectFL scores, inspection data, rankings, or coverage.
More places worth comparing
If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.
Similar Chinese in ST. PETERSBURG
Use these as a same-category comparison set so you can judge this score against nearby alternatives, not in isolation.
Other options in ST. PETERSBURG
If you're just looking for a better place nearby, start here and compare the current scores before you decide where to go next.
Join the discussion
Seen this place in person? Share what stood out โ cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.
Add your take in under a minute
Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.
Enter the 6-digit code sent to
Helpful comments beat hot takes.
Loading commentsโฆ
No comments yet โ be the first person to add useful context.