🪰75,275 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

EGGBRED

112 BARTRAM OAKS WALK UNIT 103, ST. JOHNS, FL 32259

License #6502633

🍺 Bar/Pub ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Latest inspection
July 15, 2026 · 9 findings · 3 critical
Routine - Food
View inspection data
Need help reading this?
Newest inspection first. Red dots matter most.

The score is the shortcut, but the inspection timeline is the proof. Start with the newest visit, then scan for repeat critical or major findings.

Critical
Highest-priority rows.
Major
Worth checking for repeats.
Minor
Usually lower-risk context.
Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
1
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on July 15, 2026 shows 9 observation rows: 3 critical, 1 major, and 5 minor.

Official record

DBPR source + data confidence

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Inspector notes
9
Coverage note
Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL turns public DBPR records into a scan-friendly timeline. Use the official DBPR link when you want to verify the newest inspection at the source.

What you’ll see here
  • Inspector notes appear inline when available.
  • The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
Map + verification

Open the place or verify the record

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
  • [10-07-4] In-use utensil stored in standing water less than 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Scoops on flat top in standing water at 93F, employee removed from stand to directly on flat top to reheat.
  • [41-10-4] Toxic substance/chemical improperly stored. Stainless steel cleaner stored in prep table facing toaster. Sanitizer spray bottle over single service salt and pepper packets. Operator relocated all chemical spray bottles.
  • [12B-07-4] Employee beverage container on a food preparation table or over/next to clean equipment/utensils. Open employee beverage on in use prep table in front of toaster. Employee relocated.
  • [14-11-5] Equipment in poor repair. Walk in cooler door gasket torn.
  • [24-05-4] Clean glasses, cups, bowls, plates, pots and pans not stored inverted or in a protected manner. Large black cook pot on top shelf of storage area not inverted or covered. Employee inverted.
  • [25-05-4] Single-service articles improperly stored. Box of single service gloves stored on floor of dry storage area. Employee relocated.
  • [53B-09-4] Required employee training provided by a third-party employee training program and operator unable to provide original certificate for employees trained. Some employee food handler training certificates, screenshots and photocopies not original certificate.
  • [29-42-4] Vacuum breaker missing at mop sink faucet or on fitting/splitter added to mop sink faucet. Mop sink missing vacuum after splitter on attached black spray hose side.
  • [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. At fryer station, buttermilk (55F - Cold Holding) stored on ice on top of counter. Employee relocated to reach in cooler and discussed with operator utilizing time as public health control.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

EGGBRED has some meaningful issues on record. Would you still eat here?

C record

This is where the context matters most — some people will still eat there, others will want cleaner inspections first.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.