🪰554,782 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

JVILLE CRAB SHACK NUMBER 3

700 N EDGEWOOD AVE, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32254

License #2614965

🦞 Seafood ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Quick take

JVILLE CRAB SHACK NUMBER 3 in JACKSONVILLE currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 82.3 out of 100 — a C grade — a noticeable pattern of violations across recent inspections. This restaurant has 4 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on April 3, 2026. Across those visits, DBPR recorded 34 total findings; InspectFL has imported detailed violation rows for 22 of them so far.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
4
Clean inspections
1
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
January 12, 2026

The latest inspection on April 3, 2026 had no critical findings, but inspectors still documented 3 major and 3 minor violations.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
75%
Imported observations
22
Coverage note
Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Imported inspector notes appear inline when available.
  • The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero imported notes.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Disposition: Administrative complaint recommended
  • [23-03-4] Nonfood-contact surface soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust. Observed grease build up on hood filters above cook line.
  • [31B-02-4] No paper towels or mechanical hand drying device provided at handwash sink. Observed no paper towels at hand wash sink between cook line and three compartment sink.
  • [08B-38-4] Food stored on floor. Observed box of fries stored on floor in walk-in freezer.
  • [13-03-4] Employee with no hair restraint while engaging in food preparation. Observed 1 employee engaging in food preparation with no hair restraint.
  • [01C-05-4] Clam/mussel/oyster tags not maintained in chronological order according to the last date they were served in the establishment. Observed oyster tags not stored in chronological order in tag box near first kitchen entrance.
  • [52-04-5] Establishment advertised a specific fish on the menu/menu board but served another type of fish. Observed establishment offering Red Snapper on menu displayed on TV above raw fish items. Person in charge provided box snapper originally came in which states Lutjanus malabaricus, commonly known as Malabar Snapper via Seafood List. Person in charge began changing digital menu.
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

JVILLE CRAB SHACK NUMBER 3 has some meaningful issues on record. Would you still eat here?

C record

This is where the context matters most — some people will still eat there, others will want cleaner inspections first.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.