🪰75,275 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

SHANG HAI CHINESE RESTAURANT

8744 SE 165 MULBERRY LN, THE VILLAGES, FL 32162

License #5202480

🥡 Chinese ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Latest inspection
August 13, 2026 · 23 findings · 6 critical
Complaint Full
View inspection data
Need help reading this?
Newest inspection first. Red dots matter most.

The score is the shortcut, but the inspection timeline is the proof. Start with the newest visit, then scan for repeat critical or major findings.

Critical
Highest-priority rows.
Major
Worth checking for repeats.
Minor
Usually lower-risk context.
Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
1
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on August 13, 2026 shows 19 observation rows: 6 critical, 4 major, and 9 minor.

Official record

DBPR source + data confidence

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Inspector notes
19
Coverage note
Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL turns public DBPR records into a scan-friendly timeline. Use the official DBPR link when you want to verify the newest inspection at the source.

What you’ll see here
  • Inspector notes appear inline when available.
  • The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero inspector notes.
Map + verification

Open the place or verify the record

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Disposition: Administrative complaint recommended
  • [23-03-4] Nonfood-contact surface soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust. Reach in cooler and reach in freezer gaskets soiled with food residue and mold like substance.
  • [24-08-4] Equipment and utensils not properly air-dried - wet nesting. Containers and trays stored above triple sink wet.
  • [36-73-4] Floor soiled/has accumulation of debris. Floors throughout kitchen area soiled with food residue and grease.
  • [40-06-5] Employee personal items stored in or above a food preparation area, food, clean equipment and utensils, or single-service items. Employee personal items (keys and cellphones) next to and above prep tables on cook line.
  • [22-16-4] Reach-in cooler interior/shelves have accumulation of soil residues. Reach in cooler on cook line soiled with food residue.
  • [08B-38-4] Food stored on floor. In Walk in cooler and cook line, bins and containers with food on floor.
  • [14-86-1] Non-food grade paper/paper towel used as liner for food container. To go menu in direct contact with chicken wings.
  • [13-03-4] Employee with no hair restraint while engaging in food preparation. Two male employees on cook line.
  • [35A-05-4] Roach activity present as evidenced by live roaches found. One live roach on wall next to mop sink, employee killed the roach during inspection.
  • [16-37-1] No chemical test kit provided when using sanitizer at three-compartment sink/warewashing machine or wiping cloths. For chlorine
  • [12A-07-5] Employee failed to wash hands before putting on gloves to initiate a task working with food. Male employee working at the three compartment sink and handling soiled dishes. The employee started wearing gloves and then moved to cook line, where he began handling food and single service items. No handwashing was observed prior to wearing gloves and changing tasks.
  • [12B-07-4] Employee beverage container on a food preparation table or over/next to clean equipment/utensils. Multiple employee drinks on prep tables.
  • [03A-02-5] Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Walk in cooler, tofu 51F, pork 56F, per employee items being in cooler since delivery day, Walk in cooler with an ambient temperature of 56F.
  • [02C-04-5] Operator is not properly tracking/marking the number of days ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared onsite was held at refrigeration temperatures prior to freezing in order to properly date mark the food when it is thawed and held at refrigeration temperatures again. In Walk in cooler and reach in cooler on cook line, multiple containers missing date, per employee food being cooked freeze and pulled out of freezer between 08/11-12/26.
  • [01B-36-5] Cooked/heated time/temperature control for safety food not cooled from 135 degrees Fahrenheit to 70 degrees Fahrenheit within two hours and from 135 degrees Fahrenheit to 41 degrees Fahrenheit within six hours. See stop sale. In Walk in cooler, four containers with fried chicken cooked 08/12/26 at 52F, 54F, 56 and 58F
  • [03F-10-5] No written procedures available for use of time as a public health control to hold time/temperature control for safety food. No documents available at inspection time.
  • [25-32-4] Reuse of single-service or single-use articles. Reach in cooler at the front line, observed used glove on top of raw chicken. In use Jug cut in half to scoop rice.
  • [31A-11-4] Handwash sink used for purposes other than handwashing. Hand wash sink at the front line with containers and items stored inside sink, female employee removed all.
  • [03D-02-5] Cooked/heated time/temperature control for safety food not cooled from 135 degrees Fahrenheit to 41 degrees Fahrenheit within 6 hours. In Walk in cooler, four containers with fried chicken cooked 08/12/26 at 52F, 54F, 56 and 58F
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

SHANG HAI CHINESE RESTAURANT has a rough inspection history. Would you risk it?

F record

A rough inspection history changes the conversation. This vote is a quick read on community trust.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.