🪰554,782 violations tracked across 67 Florida counties

FIRST WATCH RESTAURANT

1600 HANCOCK ROAD SUITE #105, CLERMONT, FL 34711

License #4508805

☕ Café/Breakfast ℹ️ Categories are auto-assigned based on restaurant names and may not be 100% accurate
Quick take

FIRST WATCH RESTAURANT in CLERMONT currently holds an InspectFL Health Score of 77.2 out of 100 — a C grade — a noticeable pattern of violations across recent inspections. This restaurant has 3 inspections on record from Florida DBPR, with the most recent inspection on April 28, 2026. Across those visits, DBPR recorded 22 total findings; InspectFL has imported detailed violation rows for 21 of them so far.

How to read this page

Start with the newest inspection, then verify the pattern

The score is the shortcut. The inspection timeline is the real story. Read the latest visit first, open the official DBPR record when you need the source, then compare this restaurant with other options nearby.

Record snapshot

What stands out in this inspection history

Use this as context before you scroll through every inspection.
Inspections on file
3
Clean inspections
0
Callback visits
0
Latest clean pass
None on file yet

The latest inspection on April 28, 2026 included 2 critical violations, 2 major, and 6 minor.

Inspection data quality

What’s powering this page

Official source: DBPR
Inspection coverage
100%
Imported observations
19
Coverage note
Inspector notes linked where available

InspectFL reorganizes public DBPR inspection records into a page you can actually scan. When imported inspector observations are available, they appear inline. Otherwise, the page falls back to violation categories plus the official DBPR record.

What you’ll see here
  • Imported inspector notes appear inline when available.
  • The official DBPR inspection timeline still stays visible, even on pages with zero violations or zero imported notes.
Location + actions

See the place, then share or verify

DBPR
Facebook
X
Reddit

*Scores are calculated by InspectFL based on public DBPR inspection data and are not official state ratings.

Link copied to clipboard!
Inspection timeline

Inspection History

Read the newest inspection first, then scan for patterns. Repeated high-priority findings matter more than one isolated bad day.

Critical Major Minor

Inspector notes are being added across all restaurants. Some inspections may only show violation codes until notes are available.

  • Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action
  • [21-23-4] Establishment using sponges on cleaned and sanitized, or in-use food-contact surface. -mint crystals glass rimmer container
  • [22-02-4] Food-contact surface soiled with food debris, mold-like substance or slime. -interior of oven -grates on salamander
  • [35A-02-7] Live, small flying insects found -1 in prep area
  • [08B-49-4] Employee personal food not properly identified and segregated from food to be served to the public. -above dry goods rack beside walk in cooler, operator relocated
  • [31B-04-4] No handwashing sign provided at a hand sink used by food employees at server beverage station
  • [08A-05-6] Raw animal food stored over/not properly separated from ready-to-eat food. -raw cold smoked salmon next to diced turkey and above pasteurized eggs in walk in cooler. -raw cold smoked salmon behind prepped veggies on make table cooler on cook line. Operator moved salmon to bottom of walk in cooler and to the front of the make table.
  • [36-62-4] Light not functioning in kitchen over single service storage rack
  • [23-03-4] Nonfood-contact surface soiled with grease, food debris, dirt, slime or dust. -speed racks -gaskets on walk in cooler door -underneath grates on bread toaster on front line.
  • [31B-03-4] No soap provided at handwash sink at server beverage station.
  • [24-08-4] Equipment and utensils not properly air-dried - wet nesting. -metal pans on dish rack
Community reaction

What do locals think?

Use the inspection history as the starting point, then compare it with real diner feedback. Vote first, then scroll a little lower to add what you actually saw.

Community pulse

Would you eat here?

FIRST WATCH RESTAURANT has some meaningful issues on record. Would you still eat here?

C record

This is where the context matters most — some people will still eat there, others will want cleaner inspections first.

Join the discussion

Seen this place in person? Share what stood out — cleanliness, food handling, service, or whether the inspection record matches the real experience.

Add your take in under a minute

Sign in once, then comment, reply, and save restaurants to your watchlist.

or comment with email

Loading comments…

Keep exploring

More places worth comparing

If you're deciding where to eat next, compare this page with similar spots nearby instead of relying on one score in isolation.